![]() THE PROHIBITIONS CONTAINED IN ARTICLES 9 AND 13 ARE AIMED AT ANY TAX DEMANDED AT THE TIME OF OR BY REASON OF IMPORTATION AND WHICH, BEING IMPOSED SPECIFICALLY ON IMPORTED PRODUCTS TO THE EXCLUSION OF A SIMILAR DOMESTIC PRODUCT, RESULTS IN THE SAME RESTRICTIVE CONSEQUENCES ON THE FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS AS A CUSTOMS DUTY BY ALTERING THE COST PRICE OF THAT PRODUCT. IN THE FINANCING OF THE AID GRANTED, THE NATIONAL AUTHORITIES ARE IN PARTICULAR SUBJECT NOT ONLY TO THE OBLIGATIONS ARISING UNDER THE TREATY BUT ALSO TO THOSE ARISING UNDER THE OTHER PROVISIONS OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 3330/74. AUTHORIZATION UNDER ARTICLE 38 OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 3330/74 TO GRANT THE AIDS PROVIDED FOR THEREIN CANNOT BE TAKEN TO MEAN THAT ANY METHOD OF FINANCING THESE AIDS, WHATEVER ITS CHARACTER OR CONDITIONS, IS COMPATIBLE WITH COMMUNITY LAW. CUSTOMS DUTIES - CHARGES HAVING EQUIVALENT EFFECT - CONCEPT - INTERNAL TAXATION - DISTINCTION - JURISDICTION OF NATIONAL COURT ![]() ![]() CUSTOMS DUTIES - CHARGES HAVING EQUIVALENT EFFECT - CONCEPTģ. ( REGULATION NO 3330/74 OF THE COUNCIL, ARTICLE 38 )Ģ. AGRICULTURE - COMMON ORGANIZATION OF THE MARKETS - SUGAR - SUGAR MARKETING YEARS 1975/1976 TO 1979/1980 - AIDS - GRANT - FINANCING - SYSTEM Summary Parties Subject of the case Grounds Decision on costs Operative part Keywordsġ.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |